Skip to main content
Scientific research
Resources/Maintenance Costs
Maintenance Costs

Solar grazing budgets and cost comparison study

American Solar Grazing Association|ASGA Industry Report|2023
30%
Key Impact
Lower costs than traditional maintenance

Key Finding

Solar grazing costs are typically 30% lower than traditional landscape maintenance.

Overview

American Solar Grazing Association present compelling evidence for maintenance cost reduction through regenerative practices. This 2023 study demonstrates how alternative vegetation management approaches can significantly reduce O&M expenses while improving environmental outcomes.

Methodology

The study compared traditional mechanical maintenance approaches with regenerative alternatives, tracking costs, labor requirements, and operational metrics across multiple installations over extended periods.

Relevance to TerraNext

TerraNext's regenerative management philosophy aligns directly with these findings. Solar grazing costs are typically 30% lower than traditional landscape maintenance. Our approach incorporates directed grazing and native vegetation establishment to achieve similar cost reductions while building soil health and biodiversity.

Key Implications

  • Maintenance costs can be reduced by 30-75% depending on approach
  • Reduced mechanical intervention preserves soil structure and biology
  • Lower cleaning frequency needed when dust generation is controlled at source
  • Initial investment in regenerative transition typically pays back within 2-3 years

Why This Research Matters

Industry association data validates cost savings

Provides practical budgeting benchmarks

Supports business case for grazing integration

Citation

American Solar Grazing Association (2023). Solar grazing budgets and cost comparison study. ASGA Industry Report.

Apply These Findings to Your Installation

Our team can help you understand how this research translates to your specific site conditions and calculate the potential impact.